printer friendly version
Roberts named to chief justice position at Supreme Court
Tuesday, September 6, 2005
President Bush urged the Senate on Monday to quickly confirm attorney John G. Roberts Jr. as the next chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.
With Roberts at his side at the White House, Bush said it "is in the interest of the court and the country" to have a chief justice in place for the start of the October 2005-2006 term. The first day of oral arguments is October 3, when a critical Indian tax case will be heard.
"I'm confident that the Senate can complete hearings and confirm him as chief justice within a month," Bush said.
The announcement came just two days after the death of William H. Rehnquist, the 16th chief justice of the court, on Saturday night. Rehnquist, 80, died at his home in the Washington area,
succumbing to thyroid cancer. The New York Times reported that he suffered from anaplastic thyroid cancer, the most aggressive form of the disease.
Roberts is a former clerk for Rehnquist, having worked at the court from 1980-1981. During this time, Rehnquist was an associate justice who participated in cases like
Montana v. US, a seminal case that limited the civil jurisdiction of tribes.
If confirmed within the next four weeks, Roberts would be returning to familiar grounds. Beyond the
tax case being heard on October 3, the court is being asked to consider several cases that could
have significant impacts in Indian Country. Roberts would have a role in deciding if those cases
are accepted or not.
But even if Roberts were seated in time, there is uncertainty on the court due to the pending resignation of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. She announced her departure on July 1, prompting Bush to nominate Roberts to replace her as an associate.
The decision to name Roberts as chief justice, though, means there is no chance O'Connor's seat will be filled by October. This leaves open the possibility that certain cases could be decided
on a 4-4 vote, a split that affirms the lower court decision without setting legal precedent.
In the case of
Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation v. Richards, No. 04-631
[
Docket
Sheet], a 4-4 split could be beneficial for tribal interests. It would affirm a ruling by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals that the state of Kansas cannot impose a distribution tax on gasoline sold on reservations.
But the state of Kansas is also seeking Supreme Court review of another sovereignty case, involving car tags issued by the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation. Additionally, a different but related tax case involving a tribe from Nebraska that delivers gas to tribes in Kansas is on the 10th Circuit docket and could make its way up to the high court if the legal issues aren't settled.
For now, Roberts is preparing for his confirmation hearings that were due to start today.
But they were delayed due the death of Rehnquist and relief efforts for Hurricane Katrina.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has not yet announced when the new hearings will take place.
The Supreme Court itself will remain closed today and tomorrow in observance of Rehnquist's death. Rehnquist's body is being taken to the court building this morning, where he will lie in repose today and tomorrow. The public is invited to pay respects from 10:30am until 10pm on September 6 and from 10am until noon on September 7.
White House Announcement:
President Nominates Judge Roberts to be Supreme Court Chief Justice
Relevant Links:
Federal Judicial Nominees, DOJ -
http://www.usdoj.gov/olp/nominations.htm
NARF-NCAI Tribal Supreme Court Project -
http://www.narf.org/sct/index.html
Related Stories:
Roberts aided O'Connor in confirmation
process (08/11)
Rehnquist makes brief
visit to hospital for fever (08/05)
Confirmation hearings on Roberts to start Sept. 6
(8/1)
Opinion: What does Roberts think
about Seminole? (7/27)
Reagan-era
documents from Roberts released (7/27)
White House plans to release most Roberts papers
(7/26)
NARF lawyer fears Roberts will
lean conservative (07/21)
Bush names
John G. Roberts to Supreme Court (7/20)
Schumer asked about Roberts' views on Natives
(7/20)
Rehnquist slaps down retirement
rumors (7/15)
NCAI's Hall on picking a
Supreme Court justice (7/13)
Mark
Trahant: Appoint Indian to U.S. Supreme Court (7/11)
Key Republican speculates on Supreme Court makeup
(7/11)
Harjo: O'Connor trampled on
Native religious rights (7/8)
Republicans prepare for Rehnquist resignation
(7/8)
O'Connor resigns from nation's
highest court (7/5)
Justice's tenure
filled with key Indian law cases (7/5)
Supreme Court wraps up October 2004 term
(06/28)
U.S. Supreme Court vacancy impacts
tribal rights (06/20)
High court won't
take on Native Hawaiian recognition (06/14)
Appeals court to rehear tribal jurisdiction
case (06/08)
Tribal authority over all
Indians still unsettled question (06/23)
Myers not included in compromise on Bush judges
(05/24)
Tribal sovereignty must be
respected, court rules (05/13)
Supreme
Court Roundup: Indian law cases rejected (04/19)
Supreme Court refuses Bush appeal of trust case
(04/19)
Supreme Court takes drug case tied
to peyote use (04/19)
Indian lawyer
cites 'hostile' atmosphere in Washington (04/15)
Contracts still an issue despite Supreme Court
win (04/14)
Oneida Nation begins
land-into-trust process (04/13)
Supreme
Court to weigh appeal of trust lawsuit (04/07)
Supreme Court Roundup: Indian law cases
rejected (04/19)
Appeals court revives
Wind River royalty fraud case (04/07)
BIA official calls high court ruling 'quite
depressing' (03/31)
Supreme Court
overturns Oneida Nation case (03/30)
Tribes win decision in contract support cost
case (03/02)
Supreme Court takes on
tribal-state tax dispute (03/01)
Passage
of time at issue in Oneida Nation case (01/12)
Supreme Court rejects two Indian law cases
(1/12)
U.S. Supreme Court decides cases
without Rehnquist (12/14)
U.S. Supreme
Court asked to rule on state taxation (12/02)
Peabody takes coal lease dispute to high court
(12/01)
Tribal contracts pose conflict
for U.S. Supreme Court (11/10)
Court to
hear self-determination contract case (11/9)
Supreme Court takes action on Indian law cases
(11/02)
Mille Lacs diminishment case before
Supreme Court (10/22)
South Dakota
challenge to tribes rejected by high court (10/19)
Supreme Court Roundup: 2003-2004 Term (07/08)
Supreme Court affirms tribal powers over all
Indians (04/20)
Supreme Court to
resolve self-determination dispute (03/23)
Cantwell stresses importance of judicial picks
(6/17)
Tribal fears in Supreme Court case go
unrealized (5/20)
Supreme Court case too
close to call for some (4/1)
Supreme
Court tussles with tribal sovereignty case (4/1)
Supreme Court case pits tribes against states
(3/31)
Supreme Court panel's predictions
mostly came true (3/19)
Appeals court nominees draw fire
(1/30)
Bush pick worked on
Hicks case (1/30)
Venetie
foe up for appeals court again (01/08)
Bush nominee familiar with Indian law
(5/9)
Indian Law and the
Supreme Court (12/11)
Copyright © 2000-2005 Indianz.Com
